24/7 online - 
1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
Login
August 8th, 2017 
admin World War I
Paper instructions:
Conduct a Google search on World War I. Select a website (avoid wikipedia and other online encyclopedia sites) on your topic or person of interest and complete one web critique. You must follow these guidelines on “How to Write a Web Critique”
Look for sites from authoritative sources like Universities or professional associations or institutions. You must visit your chosen website and spend some time familiarizing yourself with its content.
2. Each critique must list the title and web address of the website at the top of the critique.
3. Each critique should discuss the following topics:
– A brief overview of the subject matter.
– What is most interesting about the site?
– What did you learn from the site?
– How could the site be improved?
– Would you recommend the site to others?
Remember: This is a history class, not a web design class. The vast majority of your critique must focus on historical information and not on whether you liked the background colors or thought the site links were hard to follow.
4. Proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation must be followed.
5. Each critique must be a minimum of 250 words.
6. Severe point deductions will be applied f Philosophy of Human Nature
Paper instructions:
Henrish, I am interested in using you to help me with this paper. Please indicate in your notes with your bid if you are familiar with the topics below and also, which question you would like to write about. Thank you.
****If you’d like to help me with this paper, please indicate in your notes with the bid which question you would like to answer.**** Please read all of the directions before placing a bid.
In considering the following questions, I need the writer to be very familiar with Philosophy and philosophers. This far in the class we have studied: The first few Chapters of the Plato Republic, Epictetus, Aristotle, St. Paul, St. Augustine, St. Thomas, and Richard Hooker. It’s extremely important that you understand the concepts below from the point of view of these philosophers, so it may be beneficial that you have read one of more of the books about these philosophers.
1 of the 4 following questions must be answered in a 4-5 page, double spaced argumentative essay in APA format. Be sure to consider objections to your position.
1. Which of the philosophers that we studied do you think has the best account of the relationship between human happiness and misfortune? Justify your answer in part by showing why your choice is superior to at least two of the other philosophers’ views.
2. Does an adequate account of human nature need to make reference to a supernatural end? Justify your answer in part by showing why it is superior to that of at least two of the philosophers we have studied who disagree with you. Make sure that you offer a philosophical justification for your answer.
3. Which of the philosophers that we have studied offered the best account of justice? Justify your answer in part by showing that your philosopher’s answer is superior to that of his rivals.
4. How should the fact of human evil affect our view of human nature and our ability to achieve happiness? Is the universe ultimately morally absurd, or must/does justice win out in the end? Construct your answer with specific reference to at least two of the philosophers that we have studied, and be sure to offer a philosophical defense of your position.
NOTES from the professor:
Note1: for essay question one, Glaucon and Adeimantus are not to be considered “philosophers;” if you wish to defend Plato, you must consider the thinkers who follow him including Epictetus, Aristotle, and the Christians.
Note2: treat the Christian thinkers (St. Paul, St. Augustine, & St. Thomas) as “one” philosopher for purposes of understanding the term “philosopher” in this exam.
Note3: on the questions which might be answered with a religious solution, note that I have specifically required a philosophical solution. Religious truth may be a part of the solution, but it must be explicated and to some degree justified philosophically. If you have any questions about this requirement, be sure to ask me in advance of the exam due date.
Note4: in a number of the questions I have required you to justify your answer “in part” by consideration and contrast with the views of other philosophers. This is not to suggest that merely explaining that you disagree with someone else constitutes an adequate justification for your view. So, be sure to offer a solid argument for your position in addition to answering any objections from other philosophers.
Note5: regardless of which question you choose to answer, you must cite the original primary sources, not just the chapters in the course textbook, Philosophy of Human Nature.
Note6: be sure to employ footnotes for all documentation and annotation. or not following these guidelines.
7. Any hint of plagiarism will result in an automatic Zero for the entire exercise. This includes “copying and pasting” from the web. Make absolutely certain that the critique is your own work and is written in your own words.
Posted in Uncategorized 